2006 Lung Cancer Stats for California - Good News or Bad?
The California Cancer Registry and the American Cancer  
Society have just released a new booklet "California Cancer  
Facts and Figures, 2006".  For those of you living in California  
with any form of cancer, I urge you to get this informative  
booklet.
For this report, I will just be focusing on the stats for Lung  
Cancer in California. California is a leader in tobacco tax  
initiatives. Following the cancer trends in California will  
determine what measures the rest of the country must take to  
decrease the lung cancer rates overall.
Good News! - Basically
Basically, the news is very good. From the period of 1988 -  
2002, all types of incidences of cancer in California went  
down by 12%.  Cancer mortality declined by 19%. Thanks to  
Proposition 99 - the California tobacco control initiative  
passed in 1988, tobacco-related cancers sharply declined,  
much more than any other state. Tobacco-related cancers  
include cancers of the lung, larynx, mouth, pancreas,  
stomach and bladder. However, lung cancer still causes  
more deaths than any other cancer.
What About New Cases?
Out of all Californians alive today, about 15 million will eventually get some form of cancer, that is about two in five.  
Over the years, cancer will strike around three out of every  
four families. This year alone, there will be more than 15 new  
cases diagnosed every hour of every day. For men, of all the  
new cases diagnosed, 13% of them will have lung cancer.  
For women, that number is 12%.
Tobacco-Related Cancers
Presently, about 85% of lung cancer is caused by cigarette  
smoking. However, many other cancers are caused by  
tobacco as well. Overall, one of every three cancer deaths is  
due to tobacco.  The incidence of lung cancer decreased by  
26% in the time period mentioned above. Needless to say, for  
those smokers who have quit smoking, your chances of  
getting lung cancer decreases over time. After 15 years, the  
risk is only slightly higher than among people who have  
never smoked.
Secondhand Smoke
I think we all know by now that secondhand smoke has been  
determined to cause cancer in humans. But did you know that  
every year in the U.S., about 3,000 non-smoking adults die of  
lung cancer directly as a result of secondhand smoke? The  
most recent high-profile example is Dana Reeve, wife of  
Christopher Reeve. It is believed she may have contracted it  
from secondhand smoke as a result of her years as an  
entertainer in music clubs.
Secondhand smoke is particularly harmful to children.  The  
good news is in 2004, more than 80% of California  
households with children younger than 5 completely stopped  
smoking in the home.
Alarming Smoking Trends
Given that lung cancer rates in California have dropped  
significantly, it would be logical to assume that the smoking  
rates have also dropped, wouldn't it? And in fact they have,  
among most adults and teenagers. In 2004, 15% of California  
adults still smoked.
The alarming trend is the increase in 18-24 year old smokers.  
They are the fastest growing rate of smokers in California and  
the tobacco companies are targeting them as the "smokers of  
the future".  The smoking rate for 18-24 year olds was 18% in  
2004.
What Can Be Done?
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in California.  All  
cancers caused by tobacco and heavy use of alcohol can be  
prevented completely. In 2006, 18,000 Californians will die  
because of tobacco use.
Early diagnosis can save lives by identifying cancer when it is  
in the curable stage. The five year survival rate for most  
cancers is very good if it's caught early. Unfortunately, the  
statistics for lung cancer are not so good, mostly because it is  
difficult to diagnose early enough.
The California tobacco control initiative has helped to put a  
dent in the lung cancer rate.  Californians need to stay  
informed and aware. More cigarette tax legislation is on the  
way.
To get your copy of the California Facts & Figures 2006, go to:  
http://www.ccrcal.org.
 
0 comments:
Post a Comment